Assad: „Weißhelme“ erwartet das Schicksal von Terroristen

Syriens Präsident Baschar al-Assad

Diejenigen Mitglieder der „Weißhelme“, die sich weigern, ihre Waffen niederzulegen und von ihrem Recht auf Amnestie Gebrauch zu machen, werden laut dem syrischen Präsidenten Baschar al-Assad wie jeder andere Terrorist vernichtet werden.

„Das Schicksal der,Weißhelme‘ ist dasselbe, wie das eines beliebigen Terroristen. Sie haben zwei Wege – entweder die Waffen niederlegen und die Amnestie nutzen, wie das schon seit vier oder fünf Jahren passiert, oder beseitigt werden, wie die anderen Terroristen“, sagte Assad am Donnerstag gegenüber russischen Medien.

Zuvor war bekannt geworden, dass Israel auf Bitten der USA, Kanadas und einiger europäischer Länder Mitglieder der „Weißhelme“ aus Syrien evakuiert hat. Bundesaußenminister Heiko Maas erklärte daraufhin, Deutschland werde einige dieser Mitglieder aufnehmen.Die „Weißhelme“ präsentieren sich als Zivilschutzorganisation in Syrien ohne politische Agenda. Der Organisation wird jedoch vorgeworfen, inszenierte Videos aus Syrien zu verbreiten: So haben syrische Journalisten mehrere Aufnahmen gezeigt, auf denen die „Rettungskräfte“ mit Waffen und in Militäruniform zu sehen sind. Das russische Außenministerium bezeichnete die Tätigkeit der „Weißhelme“ als Teil einer Verleumdungskampagne gegen die syrische Regierung. Der Präsident Syriens, Baschar al-Assad, sagte früher, dass die Mitglieder der „Weißhelme“ in der Tat Anhänger von Al-Qaida seien.

Weißrusslands Schicksal — Okkupationspläne der USA (Valeriy Pyakin 09.07.2018)

Rubrik «Frage-Antwort» (https://fct-altai.ru/qa/question) auf der Seite von „FKT“ Projekt unterstützen: Sberkart 4276020010159462 Yandex.Money 410012141177441 PayPal: fct-altai22@yandex.ru WebMoney RUR: R731271274986 WebMoney EUR: E183132214214 WebMoney USD: Z229065443747

Earth Alliance Cryptocurrency Report, Q3 2018

It has been some time since our last reports (Q1-2018 and Q4-2017).  That’s okay—we are strong believers in taking a long-term approach to investing.  It’s well documented that overactive trading is detrimental to investors’ financial health, let alone their mental health.  The best thing to do is often… nothing.  Patience is a virtue.

Tech entrepreneur Naval Ravikant has said that “99% of all effort is wasted.”  This principle applies doubly in the world of investing, where over-trading can result in real financial losses stemming not only from bad trading decisions, but also from trading fees.  Just as it is in the best interest of the news media to stir people into a frenzy, so is it in the interest of the financial establishment, including the growing cryptocurrency establishment, to encourage investors to over-trade their accounts.  The real beneficiaries of all that trading are the exchanges, brokerages, and market makers who collectively skim fees and take a percentage of every trade, in the same way that casinos take a percentage of all gamblers’ bets.

In fact, the main organizations making money from the cryptocurrency markets so far are those which are facilitating trading.  We are reminded of a conversation with a top trader at a global investment bank in which he attempted to explain what it is exactly that investment banks do.  “We are the casino,” he said.  “Our clients are the gamblers.”

Make no mistake, the world is a giant casino.  People are human and are strongly attracted to things with addictive power.  We wonder what the world would look like without any businesses based on alcohol, caffeine, sex, or gambling.  It would surely be a very different place.

Where we have advocated trading before is in the rebalancing of a carefully constructed portfolio.  Rebalancing—or constantly buying low and selling high—is a way to harvest volatility.  The burgeoning cryptocurrency markets are extraordinarily volatile, so there is an extraordinary opportunity to harvest volatility, which is a kind of wealth transfer from short-term trend-followers and day traders to rebalancers.

However, there are two issues with this approach.  The first issue is taxation, because from a tax perspective, constantly selling winners and reinvesting the proceeds into losers is exactly the wrong thing to do because it maximizes realized gains.  Thus, the effectiveness of rebalancing depends a lot on one’s tax jurisdiction.  There is no point in rebalancing if the gains harvested must be paid to national governments and used to help them delay their inevitable bankruptcies.

In fact, simply spending the cryptocurrency itself is a taxable event in most jurisdictions.  Germany is the exception, and that country has moved to recognize Bitcoin at least as legal tender.  But in most other jurisdictions, buying a cup of coffee with Bitcoin would technically trigger a capital gain or loss.  This is obviously an untenable situation, and very few investors would even have the ability to keep track of all such dispersals to comply with the tax reporting requirement.

The situation is even worse if you imagine a future world of micro-transactions where cryptocurrency users are spending the equivalent of one cent here and there to pay for various services like data storage.  We joked that cryptocurrency investors should start dumping million-page Schedule D forms onto the front lawn of the IRS.  If spending cryptocurrency triggers capital gains, then it is much better to just HODL and never spend it, but that would kind of defeat the purpose of it—cryptocurrency was originally envisioned to be a medium of exchange and not simply a store of value.  This is just one of many ways in which cryptocurrency is pitted in a battle against governments, and in which government regulation is, as always, lagging far behind technological innovation.

On the topic of tax, we will mention here that the large capital gains realized by active cryptocurrency traders in 2017 are one possible explanation for the brutal cryptocurrency market sell-off that began in December 2018 and accelerated into the first quarter of 2018.  Anyone wanting to take some profits out of the market at that time would probably not have wanted to sell until the new year so as to delay owing taxes by at least one more year.  But knowing that many investors might sell out in January could in theory cause a sell-off in December, as investors willing to foot the tax bill sooner tried to get out before more widespread systematic selling began—and a sell-off starting in December is exactly what we saw.

The market peak also coincided with the launch of the Bitcoin futures trading that many market participants feared that would allow large-money interests to systematically short the market, thus driving it down.  In reality, initial futures volumes were very low, but remember that markets are often driven more by fear and expectation than by actual events.

In any case, speculating on the causes of the sell-off is beside the point.  Markets have a mind of their own (are they sentient?) and our job as long-term investors is to ignore the short-term fluctuations, however painful they may be.  The history of cryptocurrency is fraught with huge sell-offs, so it is really par for the course.

We need to examine the market with a wider lens.  The always-entertaining John McAfee put it succinctly: “Okay, people:  Can we please get real?  One year ago to the day, Bitcoin was at $2,560.  Today it is over $6,000.  That is a 140% increase.  This year-to-year increase has been accelerating significantly.  Stop the short-term thinking.  Get real.”

Back to the topic of portfolio rebalancing, there is also an argument that rebalancing a portfolio of small tech startups is not a correct approach, given that tech startups tend to follow a power law distribution, meaning that a few companies (or coins in this case) come to dominate and the rest fail miserably.  In such a market, the best approach is to diversify but to let the winners ride, instead of rebalancing out of them and into the losers.  Of course, there are those “Bitcoin maximalists” who feel that Bitcoin itself is the only real long-term winner and that the ICO market is a land of empty promises.

The Bitcoin maximalists were not right in 2017, as the price-performance of Ethereum trounced that of Bitcoin itself and Bitcoin market dominance declined dramatically, but it remains to be seen if this trend eventually reverses.  Bitcoin maximalist (and voracious carnivore) Saifedean Ammous published a book called The Bitcoin Standard, which makes a strong argument that Bitcoin improves upon the central banking gold standard, or in other words, that it is like Gold 2.0.  The book was well summarized by a former advisor to the French prime minister.

However, gold bugs like Jim Rickards often point out that Bitcoin is not backed by anything real and is a far cry from gold.  Gold is a very special element of the universe that is probably only produced in massively energetic neutron star collisions.  We have a feeling that this debate will not be resolved anytime soon, which is probably a boon for Bitcoin, given that it is still just a small fraction of the size of the gold market.

Somehow we are reminded of the recent film Ready Player One.  While the virtual world is certainly not a nirvana, it is pretty obvious at this point that it is ever-increasing in size and importance.  This probably bodes well for virtual currency.  But zooko from the Zcash project put it well when he said, “I’m a maximalism minimalist.  The universe is always at least an order of magnitude bigger than what you can see.”

Of course, establishment economists such as The Financial Times‘ Izabella Kaminska have long argued that, as a currency, Bitcoin is even more untenable than gold.  The argument is based around the idea that money supply should expand and contract fluidly as needed to maintain price stability and avoid dreaded deflation.  In fact, Bitcoin could be even more deflationary than anticipated, given that approximately 5% of cryptocurrencies are irretrievably lost annually according to one estimate.  That is a lot of forever-sunken gold.  In any case, readers of The Financial Times might now be kicking themselves for having missed out on the entire blockchain revolution so far.

Keynesians aside, if gold and cryptocurrency are the two main contenders for a global store of value, then what about gold-backed cryptocurrency?  There is an argument to be made that it would be the best of both worlds, but it’s not that clear.  For one thing, gold-backed cryptocurrency reintroduces the need for trust.  Bitcoin maximalists love the fact that Bitcoin is fully decentralized and trust-less (putting aside the fact that most mining is controlled by a couple of people in China).  With gold-backed cryptocurrency, there is obviously a need to believe, or trust, that there is actually some amount of gold located somewhere and allocated to every unit of the cryptocurrency.

Moreover, while we have argued for real asset-backed cryptocurrencies in the past, it is far from clear how some of them would function practically.  One major issue was well summarized in a recent tweet:  “If I buy a tokenized house and lose my private key, have I lost ownership of my house?  Can I never sell it again since I can’t technically transfer the key?  Who can issue me a new key?  Where is the real ownership ledger?  What is the use of the token?  Honestly wondering.”

We recently mused that the ideal global currency might simply be micro-shares of the global all-asset portfolio.  One unit of the currency would represent a small ownership stake in every publicly tradeable asset in the world in proportion to the asset’s size.  Thus it would be a recursive system where the currency itself would have an earnings yield, as opposed to cash or gold which naturally yield nothing, or which often actually have a negative yield in the form of inflation or storage costs.

Anthony Pompliano, or Pomp, is a big proponent of the idea of “tokenizing the world,” and is one of the most incessantly positive cryptocurrency commentators.  But he recently decided to take a break from the negativity of the online world following a thread for which he was criticized for being over-enthusiastic about the potential of tokenized securities.

Many people pointed out that re-implementing existing securities in the form of tokens will not necessarily be as large of a wealth transfer event as the invention of a new gold-like asset (Bitcoin).  But it remains to be seen how it all plays out.  It is quite possible that the very concept of equity, or of shared corporate ventures, will be transformed by the advent of cryptocurrency.

Indeed, ICOs have recently overtaken other forms of fundraising even though they do not convey typical equity rights to investors.  So it remains to be seen how ventures are funded and earnings shared with investors in the future.  Remember that we are already living in a world where many of the leading tech stocks do not own much in the way of hard assets and do not typically pay out dividends to investors.  Tech stocks are already quite “virtual” in a sense, and have already evolved a long way away from the more traditional idea of what a stock should be.  This process is bound to continue as cryptocurrency continues to revolutionize Silicon Valley.

We take Pomp’s temporary departure from online commentary—just before the summer solstice—to have coincided with a low point for the market.  Cryptocurrency’s most enthusiastic and incessantly positive commentator could not withstand the negativity and he surrendered.  And while we generally shy away from all forms of market timing, as described above, our sources indicated that this year’s summer solstice marked a turning point not only for the crypto markets but also for the more general ongoing battle for control of planet Earth.  We shall see.

We were very happy to see Pomp return to active commentary—on the Friday, July 13th new moon.  The numerology of this date is a bit counterintuitive, since we are taught by Hollywood that only bad things happen on this date.  But remember that Hollywood is well known to be chock-full of disinformation anyway, and the interpretation of dates and numerologies is much more complex subject than one might expect.

In other esoteric crypto news, John McAfee spent the summer solstice in a coma induced by apparent poisoning, but awoke thereafter in good spirits.  Shortly thereafter, he was forced to avoid a live speaking appearance due to “credible death threats.”  McAfee is planning to run again for U.S. president in 2020, this time on a cryptocurrency-based platform.

On the topic of security-like tokens or security tokenization, we will mention here that we are generally dividend lovers, and this is reflected in our affinity for proof-of-stake cryptocurrency systems.  One view is that proof-of-work is an “absurdly inefficient” version of proof-of-stake, given that in either system those with a lot of money are capable of coming to dominate through investment—the only difference being that proof-of-work requires much more energy expenditure and the setup of warehouses, etc.

While we concede that Bitcoin may remain on top indefinitely, our general view that cryptocurrency will continue its evolution towards proof-of-stake platforms that offer tokenization and programmability, a process exemplified by Ethereum’s great success in 2017.  In light of that, our favorite investment at the moment is Waves, a fully-functioning proof-of-stake system that is already technologically more advanced than Ethereum in many ways but which stills trades for a fraction of Ethereum’s price.  In addition, the Waves platform already includes a fully-functional decentralized exchange allowing for the secure trading of arbitrary crypto-assets without restriction.

We list our portfolio of recommendations below in rank order of our preference for each investment at the current time.  The order represents conviction, pricing/risk, and also a time preference, in the sense of some investments being more likely to mature sooner than others.  While we have advocated for an equal-weight portfolio in the past, the rank ordering information below could, for example, be used to overweight higher-conviction positions.

Note that our first three positions are all blockchains which either already are, or have some plan to become, some version of proof-of-stake chains.  Of further note is the fact that the top two positions are both using the Bitcoin Next Generation (Bitcoin-NG) consensus algorithm from Professor Emin Gün Sirer.  As one of the world’s foremost blockchain academics, Emin’s new Avalanche consensus algorithm is also one to keep an eye on.

  1. Waves
  2. Aeternity
  3. Quantum Resistant Ledger
  4. Ethos
  5. Stellar
  6. 0x Protocol
  7. Basic Attention Token
  8. Edgeless
  9. Substratum
  10. Maecenas
  11. Swarm City

As a reminder, we are providing information to the public simply out of a desire share our views and the results of our research. The battle for control of planet Earth has always been a financial battle, and within the realm of finance, cryptocurrency is the latest battleground for control of the future.

There are actually some strange theories that Satoshi Nakamoto was a time traveler. We don’t put much stock into such ideas;  however, there are many bizarre occurrences in the world of cryptocurrency that can perhaps only be explained as manifestations of the greater ongoing battle.  These apparent attacks and counterattacks can give us some insight into the future, as they give us a glimpse of some of the possible futures that certain forces are attempting to either prevent or facilitate.

Of course, we take a position alongside the forces that we feel to be benevolent.  This is our somewhat more esoteric idea of “socially responsible investing,” which is a topic of growing importance even on Wall Street.  The only problem with social responsibility is that it is a very subjective concept.  We are speaking here from the perspective of the Earth Alliance, a loose-knit collective of global organizations working for the benefit of humanity that includes the Asia-based White Dragon Society.

https://benjaminfulford.net/2018/07/27/earth-alliance-cryptocurrency-report-q3-2018/

B. Fulford, 2018-07-30 secret history of the planet Earth from 2000 to 2018

Notice to readers:  For the next three weeks, barring some unprecedented news event, the reports will be pre-written as I take my annual sabbatical off the grid and off the Internet.  Your understanding is appreciated.

As we prepare for what may be the final autumn offensive that finally overthrows the Khazarian mafia cabal, it’s a good time to look at the big picture to understand why a secret battle for the planet Earth has been raging all these years.

The best place to start is still the U.S. election of the year 2000, which was a coup d’état against American democracy that started the Nazi Fourth Reich headed by Fuhrer George Bush, Sr.  That election was between two Western secret government factions:  Faction 1—the Nazis, who wanted to kill 90% of humanity in order to “save the environment”;  and Faction 2—the Global Warming faction, who said this could be accomplished by using “global warming” as an excuse to impose a carbon tax and a world government.

The Nazis won by using fraud, murders, and death threats to terrorize the U.S. establishment into handing over power.  This was followed by very real attempts to murder 90% of humanity.  The Nazi regime of George Bush, Jr. began spreading bioweapons like SARS, weaponized bird flu, Ebola, etc. to wipe out most of humanity.  At the same time, they created starvation crises in 33 countries by paying farmers money to grow “biofuel” instead of food.  They also tried multiple times to start a nuclear world war using Iran, Syria, North Korea, and other hotspots.  This is important to remember and cannot be repeated often enough:  these people tried to kill you and your family, and are still trying to do so.

Enter the Asian secret societies.  They learned of the Nazi plans to murder 90% of humanity by successfully eavesdropping on their secret meetings, notably the Bohemian Grove gatherings.  In 2003, the spreading of SARS—a bioweapon designed specifically to target only Asians—was their real call to arms.

This led to a rupture between heroin- and amphetamine-dealing East Asian underworld groups and their cocaine- and marijuana-dealing former Nazi allies.  The Nazis, however, anticipated this break by moving their heroin operations from East Asia to Afghanistan during 2001–2002.

The Nazis, as they described in their report “Project for a New American Century,” also tried to cement their control of the world by seizing the oil fields of Iraq and Central Asia.  They use the threat of cutting off oil to keep Asia under control.

The Asians responded by threatening to assassinate the top leadership of the Western secret government.  In particular, they targeted the individuals who were members of all three of the following groups:  the Bilderbergers (European cabalists), the Council on Foreign Relations (American cabalists), and the Trilateral Commission (Japanese quislings and their masters).

The Asians also looked for Western allies against the Nazis.  They noted that a Western faction had been fighting desperately to expose and derail the genocidal plans of the Nazis.  This can be seen, for example, in a 1997 episode of “The Simpsons” showing a book entitled Curious George and the Ebola Virus.  “Curious George,” of course, refers to George Bush, Sr.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2786966/How-The-Simpsons-predicted-U.S.-Ebola-outbreak-1997-Episode-shows-Marge-offering-sick-Bart-children-s-book-Curious-George-Ebola-Virus.html

There was also the BBC reporter standing in front of the still-intact World Trade Center Building 7, saying it had collapsed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=677i43QfYpQ

The Asians founded a group of Western allies who became what is known as the White Dragon Society (WDS).  This group includes senior people in the Pentagon, the CIA, the Russian FSB, the British Royal Family, Freemasonry, the Vatican P2 Lodge, etc.

This group attempted to bankrupt the U.S. in 2008 with the engineered Lehman shock as a way to bankrupt the U.S. Deep State—the Khazarian mafia in the U.S.  The Americans were told at the time they were no longer able to buy goods from the rest of the world on credit.  That is why the U.S. trade deficit went from over U.S. $696 billion in 2008 to $381 billion in 2009 after the Lehman shock.
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/balance-of-trade

The attempt to bankrupt the U.S. Deep State would have succeeded, too, except for the fact that the U.S. forced Middle Eastern client states to cut the price of oil they sold to the U.S., and the Chinese were fooled into supporting Communist agent Barack Obama and financing his regime.  Only later did they realize he was just a Bush/Clinton/Rockefeller slave.

Also around that time, in a series of episodes never before revealed to the public, handwritten letters were sent by the WDS to the Chinese Politburo, the Vatican, and the British monarchy that…

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

https://benjaminfulford.net/

Die Internet-Zensurmaschine der EU (Upload-Filter / Leistungsschutzrecht) www.kla.tv

► Eine neue EU-Reform soll das Urheberrecht im Internet modernisieren und wird entlarvt: Was nach mehr Rechten und Entlöhnung im Internet für Künstler, Medienverlage und Urheber aller Art aussieht, entpuppt sich als nächster Schritt in die totale Kontrolle des Internets. ✓ http://www.kla.tv/12786 Was verbirgt sich hinter Schlagworten wie „Upload-Filter“ und „Leistungsschutzrecht“? Was wurde bisher im EU-Parlament entschieden und wie wird Internet-Zensur in der heutigen Zeit umgesetzt? Kla.TV fasst die Ereignisse zusammen. WICHTIGER HINWEIS: Solange wir nicht gemäss der Interessen und Ideologien des Westens berichten, müssen wir jederzeit damit rechnen, dass YouTube weitere Vorwände sucht um uns zu sperren. Vernetzen Sie sich darum heute noch internetunabhängig! http://www.kla.tv/vernetzung Sie wollen informiert bleiben, auch wenn der YouTube-Kanal von klagemauer.tv aufgrund weiterer Sperrmassnahmen nicht mehr existiert? Dann verpassen Sie keine Neuigkeiten: http://www.kla.tv/news von es. Quellen/Links: – https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu…http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/g… – – https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upload-…https://www.srf.ch/news/international…https://www.watson.de/digital/intervi…https://www.change.org/p/stoppt-die-z…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RrS4… – – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWODQ…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DKk6…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LV3qi…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsIH8…

Mysteriös – Wird Griechenland gegrillt?! Waldbrände oder Energiewaffen?

▶ Dieser Schweizer-Zeitung vertraue ich, denn ich kenne die Menschen persönlich, die dahinter stehen: https://www.expresszeitung.com/?atid=295 ▶ Gute Bücher, die ich gelesen habe: https://www.amazon.de/gp/registry/wis… ▶ Paypal: Wer meine Arbeit unterstützen möchte, dem danke ich von ganzem Herzen für eine kleine Spende via PayPal an: freundderwahrheit@gmx.ch ▶ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=9571560 Werde ein Freund der Wahrheit https://vk.com/public157104408 https://www.facebook.com/Freund-der-W… Wird Griechenland gegrillt? Waldbrände oder Energiewaffenangriff?! Europa brennt! Im Fokus steht Griechenland. Allen voran die Küstenstadt Mati wurde von einer Feuerwalze überrannt. Doch das Schadensbild lässt Zweifel aufkommen. Ganze Kolonnen von zerstörten Autos, doch praktisch unbeschädigte Bäume, die daneben stehen. Anomalien, die auch von Zeugen vor Ort beschrieben werden und stark an die „Waldbrände“ in Kalifornien erinnern. Wird Griechenland gezielt mit Energiewaffen gegrillt? Musik: Bensound memories, Copyright free music Links: -Daily Mail, diverse Bilder: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic… – Brandherde in Europa: https://bazonline.ch/panorama/vermisc… – Ard, Mati: http://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/grie… – Luftaufnahmen, Mati: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qhxI… – ABC, Mati: https://abcnews.go.com/International/… – Time Magazine, US Luftwaffe und Anomalie: http://time.com/5349334/greece-wildfi… – Drone based Laser: https://www.defensenews.com/land/2017…

Q – der Plan die Welt zu retten – deutsch – WWG1WGA

Quelle: PalaOdin EOF lasst ihm doch ein Abo da. Danke https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kRdD29N…
We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us. Storm Is Upon Us, am 30.06.2018 veröffentlicht Q The Plan To Save The World (Subtitles) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vw9N… Meine Büchertipps: Wenn das die Menschheit wüsste https://amzn.to/2LSEsCl Wenn das die Deutschen wüssten https://amzn.to/2mSik05 Illuminatenblut: Die okkulten Rituale der Elite https://amzn.to/2LJnqtk Wichtig❗❗❗ —————————————————————– Nur jedes 3. – 4. Video wird euch in den Abos angezeigt. Die YouTube Zensur ist im vollem Gange! Um nichts zu verpassen müsst ihr einfach öfter den Kanal besuchen. —————————————————————– ►Unser Kanal: ►https://goo.gl/Ua3Axk —————————————————————– Wer möchte kann uns gerne abonnieren Danke! —————————————————————– Neu: UnsereTelegram Gruppe: ►https://t.me/joinchat/IAz7rxK1_KCt3aW… —————————————————————– Besucht unsere Seite: ►https://goo.gl/eWVy6z Oder ►https://goo.gl/2ZagG9 —————————————————————– Auf Facebook: ►https://goo.gl/WwgZFp Facebook News Gruppe: ►https://goo.gl/WZmjqy —————————————————————– Unser Notfall-Kanal: ►https://goo.gl/f7ARfR —————————————————————– Wer Lust hat kann uns gerne unterstützen: ►https://goo.gl/bpKvNS —————————————————————– Link zu unserer WEB-APP für Android ►https://goo.gl/oC6nV7 —————————————————————– Vielen herzlichen Dank! Auch ein herzliches Dankeschön an diejenigen die uns bereits unterstützt haben!